Englishman in New York

The blog of British freelance writer living in New York.
Nov
19

God Willing, We Will Prevail!

By pdberger

So I say to you, citizens of the last Arab country, this is a time for courage, for unity, for wisdom, for determination, to face these enemies with the dignity your [Syrian] president has shown, and I believe, God willing, we will prevail and triumph, fwa-salam aleikum.

And who spoke these brave words? Which proud, fiery Arab orator? Why none other than George Galloway MP for Bethnal Green and Bow, inshallah.

Here are some more of George’s words from the same speech delivered at Damascus University, which aired on Al-Jazeera TV on November 13, 2005 (courtesy of MEMRI TV):

The reason that Syria is facing this crisis is not because of any bad thing which Syria has done or any weaknesses within its democracy, or within its economy, or within its human rights record - and there are weaknesses in all three of these. The reason why Syria is being threatened is not because of anything bad which she did, but because of the good which she is doing. That’s the reason why Syria is being threatened - because she will not betray the Palestinian resistance, because she will not betray the Lebanese resistance, Hizbullah, because she will not sign a shameful surrender-peace with General Sharon, and above all - more than any of these others - because Syria will not allow her country to be used as a military base for America to crush the resistance in Iraq. These are the reasons why Syria is being targeted by these imperial powers.

[...]When Hitler was on the French coast and my country stood alone, when the Americans were watching the war on television before they joined it, we faced a violent foreign military invasion. And of course there were collaborators in Britain who would have collaborated with Hitler if he had landed, but the vast majority of British people would have fought Hitler, with their teeth, if necessary, because no free people will allow itself to be occupied by a foreign army, and Syria is a free people and will never agree to such an invasion.

[...]What your lives would be if from the Atlantic to the Gulf we had one Arab union - all this land, 300 million people, all this oil and gas and water, occupied by a people who speak the same language, follow the same religions, listen to the same Um Kulthum… The Arabs would be a superpower in the world if they had this unity, instead of the shameful situation in which the Arabs find themselves today.

[...] This is not a dream, you know. In the European Union, there is almost 100 languages, there is many religions, there is countries who only 50 years ago were slaughtering each other by the million in war - totally different cultures with nothing in common except living on the mainland of Europe. But we are making a European Union which in 20 years will balance the power of the United States of America, inshallah.

Link to MEMRI main page (with video). Link to transcript.

If he wasn’t such a dangerous man Galloway would be hilarious.

Links for today:
There’s a new anti-Galloway site in town and it looks like he means business (I’m not sure about the name though).
Tim Worstall has an interesting piece in the Times today on blogging.
Is anyone else covering this Indian sex scandal?

12 Comments

1

What a stooge. What a horribly set-up event. And what a queer command of language and grammar. Both Lenin and Mao were quoted. And what was that nonsense about the European Union being made up of peoples whose cultures have nothing in common? You don’t need to be a woolly pro-European to understand that Europe’s people’s have very much in common and that their histories have been very closely tied for centuries, and not just in some ideological surge of emotion after WWII.

He’s a queer fish, George, there’s no denying it. I think the sad thing about folks like him who seem to understand the reverse of everything which is true and see conspiracies where there is none is that their whole world view must lead to great inner turmoil, for he believes the world is actually a far nastier place than it really is, or at least, sees nastiness where there is none. Then this desperation to see victimhood and exploitation everywhere makes him hateful and pukingly conceited. I agree his views are dangerous, or at least deranged, but I don’t know if he - the man - is that dangerous, is he? I mean, does he have that much influence? I know he’s an MP and pops up in Syria every now and again, but I think most folk must see him as a buffoon, a British Zhirinovsky. Bonkers and in the public eye, yes, but his star will surely wane soon enough.

2

If most folks see him as a buffoon, how did he get elected? He must have quite a number of supporters.

A politician like Galloway wouldn’t ever be able to rise to prominence in this country. It just couldn’t happen.

3

Joe, the vagaries of the British system mean that you don’t necessarily need THAT much support (at least numerically) to win a seat in parliament. I’ve just had a quick shufti at the BBC election website and he got 15,801 votes and 35.9% of the vote, beating the then incumbent by under 1000 votes. The campaign for the seat was famously vicious, nasty, personal and even violent, and in a part of London with all the problems of a pretty grim inner city area with which, to my knowledge, Galloway had no particular connection (he had previously represented Glasgow constituencies). He went for that constituency because it had a large Muslim population, mostly poor, and the incumbent was pro-war. (I don’t know how much the fact that she was also black and Jewish figured in his logic.)

As to how his rise to prominence reflects on Britain, I couldn’t possibly say. Politics is always bound to throw up this type of demagogue once in a while. He is the one representative in parliament of one small, freakish party (68000 votes countrywide in the 2005 general election, 0.3% of the overall vote) of no great significance. He gets far greater coverage than he deserves.

4

What I think is really sad is that he’s such a hero to the bleeding heart liberals!

I mean, come on! Pick someone with half an ounce of sense in their heads!

Crap like what regularly comes out of Mr. Galloway’s mouth makes my job, as someone who is pro-Israel, a hell of a lot easier.

Onya George!

5

George Galloway: Not anti-war, just on the other side

Proof here….

6

a history of violence

People have called George Galloway a “dove”.

Is his “Arabia uber alles!” speech consistent with ‘dovi…

7

Hawks vs. Doves

People have called George Galloway a “dove”.

Is his “Arabia uber alles!” speech cons…

8

George Galloway, unplugged

I live in New York City so I’ve been told a number of times that “dissent is patriotic.” Same goes, presumably, over in Great Britain, although free speech in the U.K. ain’t what it is in the U.S. Anyway, I…

9

Well, we do live in the day and age of hyperbole, so I can see why people like him! And as a wise woman I once knew said “it looks very good to appear generous”. How kind Galloway is to stick up for those who have been ravaged by the infidels!

It seems many people have forgotten that one can complain about George Bush, issues in the U.S. etc. and still see darkness outside of the U.S. and may be also a bit of good in America. My Galloway supporting friends try to convince me that the world would be just peachy keen if it weren’t for the horrible United States. And indeed, I’d love to have an intellectual discussion about the destructive education policies of the Bush administration, etc. I’m just afraid that references to Hitler will come up if I do!

10

Alison, I feel sorry for you. You really have friends who are Galloway fans?

11

“A politician like Galloway wouldn’t ever be able to rise to prominence in this country. It just couldn’t happen.”

Imagine a white Al Sharpton?

12

“My Galloway supporting friends try to convince me that the world would be just peachy keen if it weren’t for the horrible United States.”

US out of al Qaeda!

Leave a Comment