Feb
23

Friends of Denmark

By pdberger

Hitchens springs to Denmark’s defense (via Harry’s Place):

A small democratic country with an open society, a system of confessional pluralism, and a free press has been subjected to a fantastic, incredible, organized campaign of lies and hatred and violence, extending to one of the gravest imaginable breaches of international law and civility: the violation of diplomatic immunity. And nobody in authority can be found to state the obvious and the necessary—that we stand with the Danes against this defamation and blackmail and sabotage. Instead, all compassion and concern is apparently to be expended upon those who lit the powder trail, and who yell and scream for joy as the embassies of democracies are put to the torch in the capital cities of miserable, fly-blown dictatorships. Let’s be sure we haven’t hurt the vandals’ feelings.

[...]And there remains the question of Denmark: a small democracy, which resisted Hitler bravely and protected its Jews as well as itself. Denmark is a fellow member of NATO and a country that sends its soldiers to help in the defense and reconstruction of Iraq and Afghanistan. And what is its reward from Washington? Not a word of solidarity, but instead some creepy words of apology to those who have attacked its freedom, its trade, its citizens, and its embassies. For shame. Surely here is a case that can be taken up by those who worry that America is too casual and arrogant with its allies. I feel terrible that I have taken so long to get around to this, but I wonder if anyone might feel like joining me in gathering outside the Danish Embassy in Washington, in a quiet and composed manner, to affirm some elementary friendship.

Passionate stuff. And run alongside the following cartoon:

You can read it all here.

Meanwhile, Thomas L Friedman has some thought of his own in the New York Times (Times Select only):

To understand this Danish affair, you can’t just read Samuel Huntington’s classic, “The Clash of Civilizations.” You also need to read Karl Marx, because this explosion of Muslim rage is not just about some Western insult. It’s also about an Eastern failure. It is about the failure of many Muslim countries to build economies that prepare young people for modernity — and all the insult, humiliation and frustration that has produced.

Today’s world has become so wired together, so flattened, that you can’t avoid seeing just where you stand on the planet — just where the caravan is and just how far ahead or behind you are. In this flat world you get your humiliation fiber-optically, at 56K or via broadband, whether you’re in the Muslim suburbs of Paris or Kabul. Today, Muslim youth are enraged by cartoons in Denmark. Earlier, it was a Newsweek story about a desecrated Koran. Why? When you’re already feeling left behind, even the tiniest insult from afar goes to the very core of your being — because your skin is so thin.

[...]Nearly 60 percent of the Arab world is under the age of 25. With limited job growth to absorb them, the I.L.O. [the U.N.'s International Labor Office] estimates, the region is spinning out about 500,000 more unemployed people each year. At a time when India and China are focused on getting their children to be more scientific, innovative thinkers, educational standards in much of the Muslim world — particularly when it comes to science and critical inquiry — are not keeping pace.

[...]“Pakistan’s public (and all but a handful of private) universities are intellectual rubble, their degrees of little consequence. … According to the Pakistan Council for Science and Technology, Pakistanis have succeeded in registering only eight patents internationally in 57 years. …

“[Today] you seldom encounter a Muslim name in scientific journals. Muslim contributions to pure and applied science — measured in terms of discoveries, publications, patents and processes — are marginal. … The harsh truth is that science and Islam parted ways many centuries ago. In a nutshell, the Muslim experience consists of a golden age of science from the ninth to the 14th centuries, subsequent collapse, modest rebirth in the 19th century, and a profound reversal from science and modernity, beginning in the last decades of the 20th century. This reversal appears, if anything, to be gaining speed.”

No wonder so many young people in this part of the world are unprepared, and therefore easily enraged, as they encounter modernity. And no wonder backward religious leaders and dictators in places like Syria and Iran — who have miserably failed their youth — are so quick to turn their young people’s anger against an insulting cartoon and away from themselves and the rot they have wrought.

4 Comments

1

This whole thing is getting really old, but it still amazes me that nobody even tries to look beyond the cartoons, at the political climate in which they were published. Denmark used to be a place of great tolerance, but is now run by a government who relies on the support of an openly xenophobic party (Dansk folkeparti) for majority. A party who ran a highly racist campaign in the last elections, with campaign posters of muslim faces and the words “is this your Denmark?”. Racist laws have been passed, one which forbids Danes to marry any non-EU citizen under the age of 25. Hundreds of Danes move to Sweden every year because of this law. Now, tell me how a muslim living in Denmark, who has had to live with this kind of discrimination for years already, could NOT be offended by a cartoon depicting Mohamed as a crazy-eyed savage with a bomb in his turban. It wasn’t a joke at all, it was a provocation. And now everybody is supporting this racist government and its’ racist journalists. It’s a freakin’ disgrace, and I’m ashamed to be affiliated with it. /a half-Dane in Sweden

2

Paddy, I think you’re wrong. Yes, there are tensions in Denmark. And yes, more could be done to ease those tensions. But from my reading of the cartoon furor it is Muslims outside of Denamrk who are far angrier than those inside Denmark. And most of that anger is directed at the West rather than at Denmark.

As for the latest Danish marriage laws, to the best of my knowledge they were aimed at stopping arranged marriages. Anecdotally, I understand Danes were getting fed up of the few cases in which young Muslim girls born in Denmark were being forced into marrying Muslim men from abroad so that they could immigrate to Denmark. Since the law applies to all non-EU citizens it discriminates against Muslims and non-Muslims. (In fact, the couples I know who have been adversely affected bvy these laws have all been Israeli Jews.) It seems a shame that everyone must suffer for the actions of the few, and yes, the law must change, but I don’t see why attempts to block these kinds of arranged marriages are disgraceful. If anything, I think the fact that they still take place is much more shameful.

The tone of a couple of those cartoons was disrespectful. But I don’t think they are sufficient to brand the Danish government and Danish journalists as racist. The message of those cartoons was that Islam is being used by extremists as a weapon of fear and violence. It may be an uncomfortable message. But it is the truth.

3

UrbanDigs in METRO..!

A: If you can, pick up a copy of the METRO today and go to the Blogarithms section (Page 8) written by Paul Berger. UrbanDigs is featured in this week’s column! Blogarithms is a weekly column written by Paul Berger…

4

Friedman is only partly right. It is true that in this world of high-speed and ubiquitous media, you get a vivid sense of just where you are, and that Muslims have looked in the global mirror and seen how poor they look. but if you don’t understand that that is then mixed with a sense of history gone wrong, of a deep, theocratic sense of entitlement — we muslims should rule the world — only then will you be able to understand the rage and violence.

there are lots of africans and asians and latin americans who live in underachieving cultures of poverty, who don’t “keep up”, but they don’t get suicidally genocidal or riot at the slightest slight. for a change, in his own sly way, friedman ends up being a materialist who doesn’t register the religio-psychological dimension.

r

Leave a Comment

pdberger on twitter