Bali
ByIn 2002, when I was a reporter for the Western Morning News, in England, I covered the Bali bombings that killed 202 people. “Covering the bombing†from our two-man office in Truro, Cornwall, would normally have consisted of pulling in wire copy, seeking a reaction from local surfers (the North Cornwall coast is the surfing capital of the UK), and then carrying on with all the other stories of the day.
But what made Bali different was Ray and Carole Gajardo, the parents of a 30-year-old Cornish surfer called Marc who was killed in the Bali bombing. During the following days, weeks and months I spent a considerable amount of time talking to Marc’s parents, especially Ray, as they came to terms with Marc’s death, and watched the arrest, trial and conviction of those responsible. I even spent a morning sitting in their living room, having tea and biscuits, while they told me how they planned to carry on with their lives.
Ray and Carole are remarkable people. Ray is young at heartâ€â€generous, intelligent, and passionate about the world. Marc’s death threw him into a fervor to improve the life of people in Bali whose standard of living, according to a telephone call from Marc days before the bombing, was low and whose livelihoods had been shattered by the attacks. Carole was equally warm and generous. Ray did most of the talking but it always seemed like that was because Carole knew it was the best way of helping him. The pair were like the friendly, fun-loving uncle and aunt everyone wishes they could have. There was no reason why I should ever have met them and for that reason I wish that I never had. Last week’s bombing must have brought all of the feelings flooding back.
Marc’s death was made all the more appalling by the fact that his girlfriend, a feisty 22-year-old year old named Hanabeth Luke, survived the attack. The couple had been dancing in the Sari nightclub minutes before the explosion, but when a song started playing that Marc did not like he walked off the dance floor. Hanabeth escaped through the collapsed roof of the nightclub, helping a 17-year-old Australian, Tom Singer, who had suffered burns to half his body. Tom died four weeks later. Hanabeth never saw Marc again.
Hanabeth and Marc were holidaying in Kuta on their way to Australia where they had been planning to live together. Theirs was just one of 202 desperately sad stories that resulted from that horrendous night. After the attacks, Hanabeth continued to Australia without Marc and the last I heard she had entered university there. In the year following the bombing she harangued Tony Blair during a live televised debate over his support for the invasion of Iraq. Hanabeth’s quite sensible reasoning was that she had survived a horrific explosion and she was not about to let any politician cause similar suffering in the name of ‘defeating terror’. I doubt very much that she would believe anything different to this day.
Every October for the past three years I have thought of Marc and Hanabeth, Ray and Carole, in the run-up to the anniversary of the Bali bombing. Unlike September 11, and the Madrid and London bombings, the Bali attacks always seemed more random and senseless. I suppose that was because they were directed at Hindu residents and Western tourists on a Hindu island in a Muslim nation rather than directly at a Western government or city. What can be more cowardly than walking into a resort and blowing yourself up among holidaymakers? How can anyone walk past families and children and still detonate themselves knowing the carnage it will wreak? There is no excuse for such an act. None.
Bali Links:
To The Point notes that Al Jazeera commenters blame America (and Israel) for the Bali bombings
5 Comments
October 3rd, 2005 at 5:14 pm
Little Satan and Big Satan at it again.
Englishman in NY has a beautiful rememberance of victims from the last Bali bombings and also points to a story that Al Jazeera readers blame Israel and America for the bombings, of course….
October 3rd, 2005 at 11:53 pm
“What can be more cowardly than walking into a resort and blowing yourself up among holidaymakers?”
I know this point has been made before but I don’t see how the words suicide and cowardice can be uttered in the same breath. There is nothing cowardly about blowing youself up, wouldn’t you need nerves of steel?
It is senseless, evil, stupid, sad, pathetic etc… but how is it cowardly?
Sorry to make such a pedantic point on such a deeply felt post.
October 4th, 2005 at 9:10 am
I understand what you mean Simon but I don’t agree.
The opposite of cowardly is brave. Would you describe someone who took their own life, in a painless, instantaneous manner, who never had to live with the consequences of his actions, and who believed that the act itself would guarantee himself/herself martyrdom, as brave? I doubt it.
And to do it, standing among families with little children, among husbands and wives enjoying a holiday, possibly among people of your own faith. Where is the bravery in that? All you have to do is close your eyes. Push a button. And that’s it. Eternal martyrdom.
I think it would be far braver to look at those people and to decide not to push the button. To live with yourself having not carried out the attack. Perhaps to dedicate your life to righting wrong without killing innocent men, women, and children.
October 4th, 2005 at 8:32 pm
“Would you describe someone who took their own life, in a painless, instantaneous manner, who never had to live with the consequences of his actions, and who believed that the act itself would guarantee himself/herself martyrdom, as brave? I doubt it.”
I’d describe him as insane, neither brave nor cowardly.
But it doesn’t matter how it looks from my viewpoint, they believe they are fighting for a just cause, and to me, killing yourself for what you believe to be a just cause is one of the ultimate acts of bravery. How many films end with a hero sacrificing himself for the greater good of mankind? How many medals have been awarded posthumously to soldiers killed in suicide missions?
The zealots believe they are serving Allah and they will receive virgins as a prize (rightly considered insanity in our opinion). In the Second World War we believed we were ridding the world of fascism and we’d go to heaven (rightly considered bravery in our opinion).
My point is trifling in the scheme of things but I think it is valid. These guys aren’t cowards they are lunatics. Sad, weak-minded lunatics. There can be no justification for what they do but we should at least try to recognize it for what it is. Calling them cowards is a nice way of comforting ourselves, but there’s more than a touch of playground machismo involved and it does nothing to further our understanding of how their minds work.
October 5th, 2005 at 7:03 pm
You have a point. But I think you are giving them more credit than they deserve. I don’t think these people are insane or lunatics or crazy.
They are sane, rational people who have decided to kill innocent human beings in order to advance their own extreme beliefs.
Furthermore they are not doing this facing enemy fighters—as soldiers might. They are doing it in discos and restaurants facing women and children.
They are terrorists. Their aim is to kill as many innocent people as possible in order to scare people into getting their own way.
The fact that they are willing to kill themselves at the same time—and for no reason other than the fact that they have been told they will be martyrs—makes them not crazy or brave but stupid and gullible.
I suppose my use of the word “coward” was a slip into clliche. But at the end of the day, the word does sum up one of the qualities that constitute a man capable of blowing himself up within range of innocent women and children, and never having to live with the consequences. Other qualities might be ignorance, arrogance, spite and anger.
As for understanding their minds. I think that is a pointless exercise. The world will always be full of people bent on extremism. These guys just happen to exist at this time.