Comments on: Upgrade to 2.0(.2)

By: pdberger

pdberger — Wed, 24 May 2006 18:29:46 +0000

I can switch back in two seconds but it would present a couple of problems:

1. I would go back to having only one sidebar.

2. I’d have to revert to changing the code in the sidebar myself (rather than using widgets) to add features like recent comments.

3. I felt that the old design was too narrow.

But yes, I agree, it was a lot prettier. I’m going to keep an eye out for something a little more attractive than this. I notice that Sadish, the author of the last template I used, has a three-column template in the works.

By: Michael

Michael — Wed, 24 May 2006 16:45:00 +0000

What works well for you is certainly important, and I will by no means stop reading, but, yes . . . the older one WAS prettier. Wonder if there’s a way to keep the new desing but incorporate the platform . . .

By: pdberger

pdberger — Tue, 23 May 2006 19:43:11 +0000

So that’s a thumbs down for the new design?

I know the older one was prettier but this one is so much more roomy

By: Oleg

Oleg — Tue, 23 May 2006 18:57:29 +0000

Previous layout was much better. However after trying WP a few times, I kept going back to Nucleus CMS. Probably because I enjoy messing around with the code and find their code easier to understand

By: William

William — Mon, 22 May 2006 21:51:19 +0000

Yeah, I do miss the header background photo of Berger on the subway platform. Let’s get that back!

By: Petitedov

Petitedov — Mon, 22 May 2006 05:59:32 +0000

I kind of liked the old color scheme and photo at the top. But happy redesigning, the blog looks good.

By: William

William — Mon, 22 May 2006 04:08:49 +0000

Looks good, Berger!