What’s a blog for if not, occasionally to kvell about your loved one’s brilliance? Sofie has done it again. Her audio tour of the Metropolitan Museum of Art’s Costume Institute, narrated by Sarah Jessica Parker, gets a glowing review in today’s New York Times:

IN lieu of a winter exhibition this year, the Costume Institute of the Metropolitan Museum of Art introduced on Tuesday its first fashion audio tour of the museum, describing the importance of clothes as seen in a portrait by Jacques-Louis David or a fourth-century B. C. Greek statue or a German suit of armor.

That may sound like a dull substitute for a fashion show, but the tour — because it is narrated by Sarah Jessica Parker, who talks about art history with the same breathy relish and melodic rhythm she might deploy to deliver a pun-soaked voice-over as Carrie Bradshaw — becomes a sassy exploration of dress that both reveals and titillates. That’s more than you could typically say for Asmat body masks or a Peruvian nose ornament resting in a glass case.

It takes more than just a breathy voice to render an engaging tour. It takes a talented writer and, of course, a great producer. Nice one Sof!

Scanning the Masters for Blahniks (NYT)

They pull her back in…

(Via Gawker)

“You can’t put your arms around it.”

Jewish butchers in Odessa, Ukraine, talk about the decline of Yiddish and how the city has changed. From the trailer to Odessa Motives, a documentary by an acquaintance of mine, Dmitriy Khavin, showing as part of a Jewish Documentary Series at the Anthology Film Archives on Wednesday.

This video of Sarah Palin being interviewed before she pardons a Thanksgiving turkey is almost too good to be true. (Via Swampland.)

A glimpse inside the pirate’s lair in Puntland, Somalia, last month, courtesy of Al Jazeera. (Via The Oil and the Glory)

Some notes I scribbled down over the weekend about the election. It’s a little colder now, but I think the sentiment remains the same:

The euphoria over the election of Barack Hussein Obama as the 44th President of the United States of America may have died down, but there remains a feeling—on the street, in people’s homes, in cafes and bars—that this momentous event is still percolating through society and will continue to do so for months, probably years, to come.
I live in a predominantly black neighborhood in Brooklyn, on the border of Crown Heights, scene of a race riot in 1991, and Prospect Heights, a small, rapidly-gentrifying area where just a couple of generations ago few whites would consider living.
Today, black, white, gay, straight, Jew and gentile co-exist as well as any group of people living on top of each other can. Obama’s election did little to change the geniality that characterizes daily life in many of Brooklyn’s vibrant, multiethnic communities. But it certainly changed the way I, as a white, Jewish, British immigrant, perceive, and feel proud for, my black neighbors.

On November 4 and 5, the joy over Obama’s election could be heard in the shouts and car horns echoing down our block, seen in the newspaper and magazine headlines that trumpeted a historic victory the next day, and sensed in the unusually good mood that seemed to envelop most New Yorkers for the rest of the week. It was as though the Yankees had won the World Series and the entire city was a fan.
A couple of weeks on, and that sense of victory can still be felt, whether it be a celebratory toast at a party or a snippet of conversation overheard in the street. New Yorkers have a much greater tendency to talk to each other than Londoners. And traveling home on the 2 subway train the other day, I overheard a Hispanic girl complement a black female passenger who was wearing a large pin with a picture of the Obamas above the slogan “Africa’s First Family.” Her compliment was a simple as “I like your pin.” Yet it implied “I’m with you, too.”

The last stop on the 2 line in Manhattan is Wall Street, a neighborhood that is in desperate need of “hope” and “change” and a “yes, we can” attitude. As the train rumbles into Brooklyn, white passengers disembark in the upscale neighborhoods of Brooklyn Heights and Park Slope. By the time it reaches my stop, at Eastern Parkway-Brooklyn Museum, the white exodus is almost complete save for perhaps a few white students who have opted for the cheaper rents of Crown Heights.
As a white passenger it is hard not to look at the faces of your fellow black commuters—students and workers, mothers and fathers—and wonder what it means for them and their children that after so many generations of inequality and oppression, a black man is headed for the White House? How would they have felt if, as many had quietly feared, white voters had deserted the black candidate in the privacy of the polling booth? Does it mean anything to them that more white men and women voted for Barack Obama in 2008 than John Kerry in 2004?

After exiting the train I make my way down Washington Avenue, a disheveled thoroughfare lined with shabby bodegas and peppered with numerous barber shops and hair braiding salons, Caribbean restaurants and a check cashing office. The weather is still mild enough for people to continue the summer habit of congregating on the pavement, many sitting on fold out chairs and engaged in animated conversation.
I don’t feel any more welcome weaving between them in the dawn of the age of Obama than I did last month. After all, I am still a gentrifier, a yuppie whose very presence threatens to perpetuate the steady influx of young whites to the area and to continue to drive up real estate prices and rents. But I do feel as though the gap between us has narrowed. For all they know I could have been one of the millions of white Americans who manned phone banks or fanned out across polling stations, who pulled the lever or pushed the button that helped put Barack Obama where he is today.
For if the simple act of electing a man can only go so far in healing the wounds of slavery and segregation, it does at least prove one thing. That in the space of a little under a couple of years, America has undergone a momentous change.

Slate’s Jack Shafer refers to one of my favorite media tell-alls, Stick It Up Your Punter: The Rise and Fall of the Sun, in an article explaining why the Obama-bashing New York Post has suddenly fallen in love with the man from Chicago. In Stick It Up Your Punter, this handbrake turn is referred to by then Sun editor Kelvin MacKenzie as the “reverse ferret.” Shafer writes:

McKenzie would “roar around the office shouting ‘Ferret up your trouser!’ ” whenever he wanted to alter made-up pages at top speed. “Then he might shout, ‘Reverse ferret!’ and all the pages would have to be changed all over again.”

I have no doubt that Shafer is right when he attributes the New York Post’s reverse ferret to Murdoch’s desire to keep the new administration sweet. It would not be the first time he has proven his malleability in the face of raw political power (see UK elections passim.) But I do wonder whether Shafer ought to be giving Post editors just a little more credit.

After all, the Post did all it could to tear into Obama’s campaign. But that fight is over. The first African American has been elected to the White House with a clear mandate. Even John McCain is making nice. Meanwhile, newspapers and magazines cannot publish fast enough to meet reader demand for Obama stories. Under such conditions what newspaper wouldn’t release a commemorative post-election special and stick Obama on the cover every day? (And while we’re at it, let’s not forget the Post endorsed Obama, albeit grudgingly, during the Democratic Primary, in January.)

Rupert Murdoch and the Reverse Ferret (Slate)