Archive for July, 2008
Churnalism Doesn’t Pay
Posted by: | CommentsLooks like little has changed in UK journalism since I started out at the Western Morning News in 2001. This from a correspondent to the excellent Churner Prize blog:
Two years ago my first interview after completing my NCTJ [National Council for the Training of Journalists] prelims was at a news agency. I turned down the job because they offered me £10k and expected me to run my own car. The office was in one of the most expensive parts of the country and living on £10k would have been utterly impossible. I often wonder if they found anyone to fill the role.
The good news is that it made my first job at [well-known publishing group] seem like I’d won the lottery. I was getting paid a whopping £13,838 a year and was still expected to run my own car. I was 32 years old.
In an effort to earn some extra cash I enquired about handing out the publisher’s free commuter paper at my local train station and was not entirely surprised to learn that the hourly rate was more than mine as a trainee reporter.
My starting salary at the WMN was £10,700. I was expected to have my own car, work every other Sunday and often late into the night with no overtime. I remember I used to rejoice at getting sent out on stories, just so I could earn a bit of petrol money.*
If I did manage to earn an additional £40 or £50 a month, I had very little time to enjoy my windfall. I was too busy churning out a couple of leads a day, plus a pic story, a couple of fillers and a column of nibs (news in briefs). On a good day, I probably filed about 1,000 words. On an average day about 1,500. And on a bad day 2,000 words or more.
In a stroke of genius, our uber bosses at Northcliffe Newspapers worked out a way of saving even more money by cutting down on sub editors and getting page designers to send templates directly to reporters. That way we could write our own headlines and picture captions, and sub our stories to make sure they precisely fit the page. Often we were reduced to padding stories with facts and quotes from press releases and the Internet just so we could fill the template.
We weren’t journalist, we were page fillers in a word factory. It’s a wonder that anything original makes it into local and regional newspapers nowadays when you consider how few people are filling those pages every day.
*I admit, we did earn time and half on bank holidays. And about a year after I joined the WMN, Northcliffe increased its starting salary for trainees to a colossal £12,000.
Rush, Bush, and McCain
Posted by: | Comments
There was a fascinating profile of talk radio host Rush Limbaugh in this weekend’s New York Times magazine.
I had no idea that Limbaugh went deaf about seven years ago. Nor did I realise the extent of his wealth: a contract worth about $38 million a year and five homes in a secluded beachfront estate with a half dozen flashy cars to match.
The angle of the Times piece is Limbaugh’s political clout and his planned assault on Barack Obama this fall. But what I found most interesting were his views on American conservatism, George Bush and John McCain:
Limbaugh admires many aspects of Reaganism, but he is especially animated by his belief in American exceptionalism. “Reagan rejected the notion among liberals and conservatives alike who, for different reasons, believed America was in a permanent state of decline,†he wrote to me in an e-mail message. “He had faith in the wisdom of the American people. . . . He knew America wasn’t perfect, but he also knew it was the most perfect of nations. Reagan was an advocate of Americanism.†In response to a separate question, he wrote: “America is the solution to the world’s problems. We are not the problem.â€Â
Limbaugh said he believes that President George W. Bush is well meaning but far from the Reagan standard of excellence. “I like President Bush,†he wrote me, “but he is not a conservative. He is conservative on some things, but he has not led a movement as Reagan did every day of his career. Bush’s unpopularity is due primarily to his reluctance to publicly defend himself and his administration against attacks from the left. . . . The country has not tilted to the left in my view. What has been absent is elected conservative leadership from the White House down to the Congress.â€Â
Needless to say, Limbaugh doesn’t see John McCain as the answer to this problem, and it infuriates him when McCain claims to be a Reaganite. “McCain and Reagan do not belong in the same sentence,†he wrote.
I had a spirited discussion with friends over the weekend that (term limits aside) despite his terrible approval ratings, President Bush would probably have a better chance of beating Obama than McCain this fall.
Maybe it’s a stupid idea. But Bush is younger, more charismatic, and a real conservative. If Limbaugh’s millions of listeners think Bush has failed to live up to the conservative ideal, then what hope for McCain?
And when you take into account the fact that, at almost 72, McCain is probably not fit to drive a car let alone run the country, you have to fancy Obama’s chances. (Then again, Clinton looked like a shoo-in for the Democrats this time last year. And look what happened there.)
links for 2008-07-09
Posted by: | CommentsGlobal Dance
Posted by: | CommentsWant to know more? See here.
links for 2008-07-08
Posted by: | Comments-
David Carr relates how Fox News bullies beat reporters.
-
Following on from David Carr, Gawker zeroes in on “the face of Fox’s feared, vengeful media relations operation.”
-
Fox responds to flack attack. This one is going to run…